Large-cap stocks have outperformed since 2014. Is it time for a small-cap stock comeback?

Do judge a stock by its size; it might help you figure out where to allocate your money in the coming months.
Of the 3,000 largest stocks in the U.S — the S&P 500 index tracks ~500 of the largest, and the Russell 2000 index tracks ~2,000 of the smallest.
However, it wasn’t always like this, and returns would diverge at different times. But in the long run, returns were similar.
Who performed better when? 1979-1983 (small), 1983-1990 (large), 1990-1994 (small), 1994-1999 (large), 1999-2014 (small), and 2014 onwards (large).
See a pattern? The Russell 2000 and S&P 500 would alternate outperforming in different periods, quite significantly at times.
1/ Small-caps outperformed during years of economic stress and immediately after recessions.
2/ Large-caps outperformed during the later stages of the bull market.
In a recession, small-caps are often impacted first — but may rebound faster during a recovery.
Last year, the Russell 2000 peaked nearly two months before the S&P 500. Small-caps have underperformed this year, but that could change when markets begin to recover — now looking attractive for these reasons:
Per Bank of America Equity Strategist Jill Carey Hall — the only other time small-caps were this cheap compared to large-caps was during the tech bubble (WSJ).
Loading up on an ETF tracking the S&P 500? Try your luck with an ETF tracking the Russell 2000 — like the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE:IWM).
Small-caps could fall harder if a recession manifests over the next couple of months. But from the bottom, there are reasons to believe small-caps could outperform on the way up.
Know the risks: Small-caps are riskier and fluctuate more during shorter time periods. Historically, the longer you hold Russell 2000-based ETFs, the closer their returns will be to the S&P 500.